Vector and Raster Technologies for Joomla Computers Articles | January 3 Brian Dozier Twins Jersey , 2009 Your wedding day is one of the milestones in your life that will become a defining point in your?personal?history. Memories of a wonderful wedding?day?can last forever. A?really good?wedding photographer provides you with a record of that special day that you can share with family?and friends and it is worth having?a?consummate professional handle the photography on a day that cannot be repeated and must, therefore, be captured perfectly as it unfolds.
In the old days, the 90's, raster technology - the use of a single layer as a solution for all visible publishing tasks - was king. Those days are long gone and vector technology rules now. Vector solutions comprise layers of data, and this is the way all modern graphics Nelson Cruz Twins Jersey , web pages, CAD applications, marine charts, printing jobs and much else is done.
Understanding the difference between vector and raster technologies is vital for both graphics and web page code.
Raster graphics To explain: raster graphics are single-layer files that comprise a 2D description of the data. Two dimensional files - up down and left right - are a 'flat' technology that has no depth, and has x-axis and y-axis data only. Three-dimensional technology, or 3D Miguel Sano Twins Jersey , is a more complete solution that includes depth, ie a z-axis as well. This approach can be applied to more or less anything visible, and is of interest to us for graphics and web page code in particular.
Starting with gfx (graphics): in the 90's it was only possible for mainstream applications to use two dimensions. 3D applications were expensive and unusual. Therefore at that time, and then into the early 2000's, it was accepted that 2D information was as good as it gets, for practical purposes. That all changed around 2002 and and these raster solutions became obsolete. Or more correctly Jonathan Schoop Twins Jersey , were overtaken by the availability of vector solutions in the mainstream markets.
In gfx today for example, Photoshop files are seen as a basic solution and not acceptable for full commercial use. This is because they are just simple 2D raster files. They cannot be scaled, so they are no use for full commercial use such as variable size print jobs. Such files cannot be used except at the size they are supplied, as they cannot scale. As a practical example, if you want to use your logo in a large-scale print job, or on the side of an advertising blimp Kirby Puckett Twins Jersey , you can't. If it were scaled up it would just look like a bad jpeg.
You will need a vector graphics file, which can be scaled to any size. An example is an Abobe Illustrator .ai file, which is therefore a level above Photoshop. This may conflict with the popular opinion of Photoshop being the ultimate gfx app - but unfortunately the truth is it's just a basic tool now, professional work often demands a much better application.
Raster-based web page code The same thing applies to web page code, whether on hand-coded sites or on database-driven CMS websites. The old, 90's method was Justin Morneau Youth Jersey , if you like, a 'raster' approach: everything was on a single layer. This is a crude and obsolete way to code pages now. Its use is typified by tables and cells for the layout framework.
Around 2002 this method became outdated and layer-based page code took over. This vectorised approach uses layers (divs) and CSS to build the page structure. Having a third axis means that the page code is an order of magnitude better, and there are huge advantages. Just as you cannot use crude raster gfx for many print jobs, crude raster-based 2D pagecode is long outdated for the modern Internet.
Vector-based web pages have big advantages in accessibility and SEO for example. Just in SEO, these layer-based pages are so far in advance of flat pages (those using tables) that a site using them has massive advantages. And as in the situation where Photoshop is erroneously seen by the popular media as the top gfx application, in web page authoring many see Dreamweaver as the ultimate tool. However Rod Carew Youth Jersey , web authoring applications such as SiteSpinner were using layer-based pages exclusively, years before Dreamweaver had ever heard of such a thing.
Joomla's handicap This is why Joomla CMS is now handicapped, as it is still struggling with old 90's technology here. By 2002 table-based layouts were obsolete. By 2004, div-and-table temporary compromises such as the one Joomla uses were finished. The page code layout it uses became obsolete ages ago, and so changes are long overdue. This is the single most vital change that needs to be made to Joomla, and beside this all other requirements seem much less relevant.
It's true that skilled developers can mitigate this to some extent Bert Blyleven Youth Jersey , by clever template coding. However, the effects of tables in the code can never be entirely eliminated and it's time they went. Even a remnant of this method left in a corner somewhere wrecks the project, as progress is effectively halted. Once tables have gone completely then the Joomla project will move forward faster and more efficiently.
Joomla 1.5 has comprehensive overrides available to template coders. Using these mean that a tableless layout can be implemented via the template, and an example is the Beez template. However this approach tends to result in a very simple and lightweight template, as too much is having to be done by the template coder. It's not a bad thing for SEO, of course Kent Hrbek Youth Jersey , if a template is lightweight - but what if you need a full-feature one with 30 collapsible module positions and 10 built-in colour variations?
Almost anything can be plugged in or overridden in Joomla. This is part of the tradition, and one of the many reasons it is such a powerful machine. But there i
funkings
Thema drucken
16.12.2019 07:20
Antworten
